I love corny jokes, but I feel like that didn't even pass for a joke. Whoops. Anyways, this week's post involves the use of interactive whiteboards, mainly SmartBoards. During my stint at Teachers College, I have visited various classrooms and schools, and have been student teaching in differing settings. Public, private, D75, CTT/ICT, general education... most classrooms I have seen have and make some use of SmartBoards. In fact, the one classroom that I do not see with a SmartBoard is the (very expensive) private school in which I currently student teach. But then, I can see that they do not have much need for one and would not make efficient use of one. More on that later. To begin with, I'd like to consider the classrooms that I've seen which have SmartBoards, and how they were used by the teachers.
For my mini case study, I will use my previous student teaching placement. This was a 1st-grade CTT/ICT classroom in NYC (UWS/Harlem). The students with IEPs had various levels of academic difficulties, but they were not far behind grade level content. This, however, was the case of the majority of the students in this class regardless of disability. With this class, the SmartBoard was used mainly as a substitute for an overhead projector/video display. That is, I didn't see much difference when my cooperating teachers planned to use the SmartBoard, but could not due to technical difficulties, and instead had to use other means (chart paper, the whiteboard, etc.) It definitely did serve as a motivational tool, which greatly supported some of the students in class that had trouble focusing. I just feel like with such an (expensive) expansive tool, the teachers could have done so much more. For example, it would have been great to see differentiated material within the lessons, and have the students come up in pairs and collaborate on an activity within the whole-group setting. I am definitely excited to bring out the honey badger in this assignment, as I really am not that experienced with this technology and appreciate the simple yet brilliant idea of putting a brain in a whiteboard.
As for my current placement, I student teach in a private ABA school and my classroom consists of 8 students with Autism Spectrum Disorders. There are 4 teachers in the room, excluding me, and most of the day is spent working in dyads with a teacher. In short, there isn't that much whole-group time spent in front of a board. Also, in line with the philosophy of ABA, it is important that whatever work the student produces is accounted for and graphed into a trajectory of that student's learning of what is being taught. This all renders the use of SmartBoard relatively unnecessary. However, throughout the week I will note to see where and how a SmartBoard can be used in the two periods of whole-group instruction - morning meeting and science, both 20 minutes - that will be instructive and assistive in student learning.
